Archives
now browsing by author
Yemen war: Saudi-led coalition warplane crashes

A warplane belonging to the Saudi-led coalition fighting in Yemen has crashed in the northern province of al-Jawf.
A coalition spokesman confirmed that a Saudi Tornado fighter jet had “fallen” while carrying out a support mission near Yemeni army units, according to Saudi Arabia’s state news agency SPA.
Yemen’s Houthi rebels said they shot down the plane.
The Saudi-led coalition has been battling the rebel Houthi movement since 2015.
It intervened after the Houthis ousted the internationally-recognised government from power in the capital Sanaa.
The Houthi rebels said they used ground-to-air missiles to down the warplane on Friday night. They also accused the coalition of killing 30 people in retaliatory airstrikes in al-Jawf on Saturday.
Saudi Arabia has not provided details of any casualties from the crash, or what caused it.
What’s the background?
Yemen has been at war since 2015, when President Abdrabbuh Mansour Hadi and his cabinet were forced to flee the capital Sanaa by the Houthis.
Saudi Arabia backs Mr Hadi, and has led a coalition of regional countries in air strikes against the rebels.
The coalition carries out air strikes almost every day, while the Houthis often fire missiles into Saudi Arabia.
FROM BBC NEWS
Huawei row: Australian MPs cancel UK trip amid tensions over leak

Senior Australian MPs have cancelled a planned trip to the UK as tensions heighten over the role of Huawei in building Britain’s 5G network.
Lawmakers from the intelligence and security committee had been expected to travel to the UK next month.
But the trip has been postponed amid reports of a diplomatic rift.
The decision follows a reported complaint from the UK over leaked details of a high-level meeting where Huawei was discussed.
Australia has banned the Chinese telecommunications giant from building its next-generation 5G mobile internet networks but Britain last month decided the company could continue to play a role in its system, despite pressure and warnings from Washington.
Last week, UK Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab visited Australia, where he met members of the parliament’s intelligence committee.
Details of the meeting were later leaked to the Sydeny Morning Herald, which said an MP had rebuked Mr Raab in the meeting over Britain’s Huawei decision, saying Australia was very disappointed.
According to Australian media that report prompted a formal complaint from Vicki Treadell, the UK’s High Commissioner to Australia, to the heads of two Australian parliamentary committees.
Australia and the UK are both part of the Five Eyes intelligence alliance, which also includes the US, New Zealand and Canada.
Australia’s parliament on Saturday confirmed the trip to the UK had been delayed but said it was due to the fact that the counterpart parliamentary committee in the UK was yet to be appointed following December’s election.
According to the Sydney Morning Herald, in the meeting with Mr Raab, Anthony Byrne, the deputy chair of Australia’s intelligence committee, said that allowing China to build the UK’s 5G telecoms infrastructure was equivalent to letting Russia construct it.
“How would you feel if the Russians laid down infrastructure in your own networks? That’s how we feel about Huawei,” Mr Byrne was quoted as telling Mr Raab.
In a Twitter post at the time, he said the meeting had involved a “full and frank discussion” over 5G and strategic challenges. Ms Treadell was present.
FROM BBC NEWS
Pregnant actresses: ‘We’re not treated like people’

Claire Danes’s pregnant belly was hidden with computer graphics in the second season of Homeland, Olivia Coleman hid hers in big sweaters during filming of The Night Manager. And when Gillian Anderson’s bump could no longer be hidden on the X-files, “Scully” was abducted by aliens.
But not all actors are indulged by the production.
Those playing smaller parts in films and commercials often find they are forced to hide their pregnancies, not from the viewers but from people making the programmes themselves.
Some are successful, but many are mistreated by an industry marked by high staff turnover, an overabundance of competition and in some cases, a profound lack of respect.
Several women spoke to the BBC on the condition of anonymity. All say they lost jobs or auditions when it was found they were pregnant.
Either they were asked to disclose their pregnancy on a form before their audition, or they were asked in person during their interview.
Three who spoke to the BBC were not showing at the time their commercials would have been shot.
‘I felt so weak’
Sarah (not her real name) describes herself as a jobbing actress. She mainly works on films and TV but commercials help her to pay the bills.
Early in her pregnancy, she had reservations about a commercial audition that her agent had scheduled. She decided to tell him her news and she expected the worst.
“But, he was brilliant,” she says. He told her about her rights. How under the Equality Act, she was not required to disclose her pregnancy until 15 weeks before her due date.
“They are not allowed to discriminate against you,” he promised.
The casting notice for the audition, often called a breakdown, said the ad might require some physical activity, but also mentioned a stunt double might be used for the more highly athletic moments.
Together, Sarah and her agent decided she should just go to the audition and see. “You always want to be ready and available for work,” she says.
Her worry grew as she sat among the other actresses in the waiting area outside of the audition room.
Women coming out of the session were stressed and said the experience was physically taxing. Sarah was up next. Her name was called alongside another actress who was also auditioning for the same role. They went in as a pair to see the casting director.
The other woman was chosen first to read out the lines. Then the casting director turned to Sarah.
“You’ll do the physical part. Are you fit?” she was asked. “I am fit, but I need to be safe,” she said.
“Why?” said the casting director. “Because I am pregnant,” said Sarah.
She says the casting director then became angry, saying: “Didn’t you read the script? What did you think we were going to do today? I don’t even understand why you have come. Don’t you think it was a bad idea?”
Sarah says she felt humiliated, and froze.
“I said to the casting director I’m so sorry for wasting your time, and then I even said to the other actress – I’m so sorry didn’t mean to waste your time either”.
“Then the casting director said, ‘Yes, I think it’s best if you leave’.”
Sarah left the casting and once on the street, she burst into tears. “It made me feel so unconfident about my pregnancy and my own physical ability. It made me feel so weak.”
Her “confidence was knocked,” she says, until she won a role on a television series, where the production was much friendlier and had no problem shooting her from the bump up.
Tim Gale, head of commercials at the actor’s union, Equity, is well acquainted with standing up for his members on this issue.
“We used to get two to three calls a week but we get less than one a month now,” says Mr Gale.
Sometimes, a form is provided in the waiting room which asks an actor to tick a box to say if they or their partner are expecting.
Actors of both sexes who sent the BBC copies of these forms, say that when they disclosed a pregnancy, jobs they had secured were either pulled or delayed.
A few said they spoke with the union and assumed the problem had been sorted after their particular situation was treated.
But Mr Gale says even in recent weeks, he has seen these forms pop up.
Actors’ Equity along with the Casting Directors Association and the Institute of Practitioners in Advertising, have drafted an artist declaration form.
The form only asks an actor to disclose any reputational risk or any reason an actor might not be able to travel by plane. There is no mention of pregnancy.
The actor’s union has lobbied production companies to use this new form, but there is such high staff turnover in production companies, the old forms keep popping up.
Sometimes the insurance companies that underwrite commercial productions demand such a form be used and Equity has had to fight this, too.
Pregnancy is not a disability under the Equality Act – and therefore insurance companies cannot demand the production company deny work to those expecting.
‘A long road’
If an actress wins a role, an insurance company is allowed to ask after the health of an actress. Commercial productions only film for a day or two and an intense risk assessment is carried out to factor costs that might occur from a delay in shooting.
While it is not appropriate to ask at the job interview stage, once they are cast, the insurance company backing the production can ask, for example, if an actress is pregnant.
They can also raise their premiums if they find out a woman is pregnant, but extra costs have no impact on the law. The actress cannot be fired, as it would be discrimination.
However, experts say, the same insurance company could be liable if a director or producer misuses that information and the actress is fired.
“Things are much better than they were, even five years ago. But it has been a long road getting to this point,” says Mr Gale.
The association which represents casting directors says it is not acceptable to ask actors if they are pregnant “before or at casting calls”.
“If actors are pregnant, we would expect casting directors to support them, as well as those who may be breastfeeding or have childcare commitments,” says Kate Evans the chair of the Casting Directors Association.
Know your rights
Many actors are unaware of their rights under the 2010 Equality Act. The Equality and Human Rights Commission – responsible for enforcing the act – says actors should not be asked any personal questions about relationships and family planning in interviews.
“Such attitudes are straight out of the dark ages and have no place in a modern working culture,” says the Commission. “Everyone has the right to work and a working environment that allows them to achieve their full potential.”
Katie Wood, a barrister for Maternity Action says sometimes the law is misinterpreted because employers think the Equality Act only covers full-time employees, but pregnancy rights extend to the self-employed as well.
“To ask someone about whether their partner was pregnant holds the potential for associative discrimination,” she says.
English case law on actors is varied and in some results, actors have been categorised as “service providers”. This means they work like a sole trader who might provide a service to a company, much like a plumber. But Ms Wood says even then, the Equality Act applies.
‘Lonely experience’
One actress tells the BBC that she continued to work because she just “flat out refused” to mention her pregnancy. “I didn’t tell my agent. I didn’t tell anyone. I was afraid it would cost me work.”
She was cast in a film and between the costume fitting and the movie shoot there were a couple of weeks.
“When I put on my costume I had definitely gained weight. They asked, ‘what happened?’ And I just threw up my hands and said, ‘Oh, yeah. I wonder why’.”
She did not know what her rights were and she felt it was just better to keep it a secret because actors are “so easily replaceable”.
Having courage was hard, she says. “I had such bad sickness in the beginning, but couldn’t tell anyone. I was also nervous because what if something went wrong?
“What should have been such a natural thing was a really lonely experience.”
Another actress agrees: “As actors, we are not treated like people. It’s like we just don’t matter.”
Coronavirus: First death confirmed in Europe

A Chinese tourist has died in France after contracting the new coronavirus – the first fatality from the disease outside Asia.
The victim was an 80-year-old man from China’s Hubei province, according to French Health Minister Agnès Buzyn.
He arrived in France on 16 January and was placed in quarantine in hospital in Paris on 25 January, she said.
Only three deaths had previously been reported outside mainland China – in Hong Kong, the Philippines and Japan.
However, more than 1,500 people have died from the virus within China, mostly in Hubei where it first emerged.
A further 2,641 people have been newly confirmed as infected, bringing the China’s total to 66,492.
What has happened in France?
In late January, France became the first European country to confirm cases of the virus. It has had 11 confirmed cases of the disease, officially called Covid-19. Six people remain in hospital.
The deceased man had been in a critical condition in the Bichat hospital in northern Paris, the health minister said. He died of a lung infection due to the coronavirus.
The man’s 50-year-old daughter is among the six in hospital with the virus, but she is recovering, Ms Buzyn said.
The other five are British nationals who caught the virus at a chalet in the ski resort of Contamines-Montjoie.
How are other countries affected?
Outside mainland China, there have been more than 500 cases in 24 countries.
Earlier, the US said it was sending a plane to Japan to evacuate Americans stuck on the Diamond Princess cruise ship, which is being held in quarantine in a Japanese port.
Out of 3,700 people on board, 218 have tested positive for the virus. Australia also said it was considering removing its citizens from the ship.
Egypt’s health ministry on Friday confirmed the first case of the coronavirus in Africa. The ministry described the person as a foreigner, but did not disclose their nationality.
How is China coping?
Despite the spread of the virus, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said on Saturday that the outbreak in China was now “generally under control”.
The foreign minister said outside Hubei province the number of new infections had fallen for 11 consecutive days. He said there had also been a rapid increase in the number of people who had recovered.
However, new figures released on Friday revealed the toll on medical staff in the country. Six health workers have died and 1,716 have been infected since the outbreak, officials said.
Local authorities have struggled to provide protective equipment such as respiratory masks, goggles and protective suits to hospitals in Hubei.
Meanwhile, Beijing has ordered everyone returning to the city to go into quarantine for 14 days or risk punishment.
The World Health Organization is beginning an investigation in China this weekend into the outbreak.
Body of Stephanie Simpson, British hiker missing in New Zealand, found

Police in New Zealand have found the body of a British woman who disappeared during a hiking trip earlier this week.
Google ordered to reveal author of Australian dentist’s bad review

An Australian court has ordered Google to identify the person behind an anonymous bad review of a dentist.
Dr Matthew Kabbabe, a teeth-whitening specialist in Melbourne, sought the order so he could sue for defamation.
He claimed user CBsm 23 had damaged his business by telling others to “STAY AWAY” from a procedure criticised as “extremely awkward and uncomfortable”.
The ruling forces the hand of the tech giant, which has previously defended allowing negative reviews on its site.
Under the order, Google will be required to pass to Dr Kabbabe any personal details such as any names, phone numbers, location metadata and IP addresses linked to the account.
International law allows for people to seek documents from overseas parties that they need for their case.
‘Groundbreaking’ case
Google had previously rejected the dentist’s requests for the review to be removed, or to share information about its author.
According to his affidavit, Google had told Dr Kabbabe: “[W]e do not have any means to investigate where and when the ID was created.”
However, Justice Bernard Murphy ruled that Dr Kabbabe had grounds to pursue a defamation case and that Google was “likely to have or have had control of a document or thing that would help ascertain that description of the prospective respondent”.
Mr Kabbabe’s lawyer described the ruling as a “groundbreaking” win for small businesses, and argued Google had a duty of care in providing a platform for potentially defamatory postings.
“If you’re out there trying to hide by anonymity, even via VPN, I think the court system’s catching up now and there are ways and means of obtaining that information,” Mark Stanarevic told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation.
Google is yet to reply to queries about the ruling. The firm has previously been reluctant to remove bad reviews, but has done so in several instances following court orders.
Last year, it told Australian law reform experts that defamation cases over online reviews could lead to the suppression of consumer rights and free speech.
Huawei: US issues new charges of racketeering and theft

The US has expanded its lawsuit against Huawei, accusing the Chinese telecoms giant of a “decades-long” plan to steal technology from US firms.
Prosecutors said Huawei had violated the terms of partnerships with US companies and stolen trade secrets such as source code and robot technology.
It adds to a list of other charges brought by the US last year.
Those accused Huawei of violating US sanctions and stealing technology from T-Mobile. Huawei has denied the claims.
The firm, one of the world’s biggest smartphone makers, said the US is targeting it because its expansion is a threat to American business interests.
Meng Wanzhou, its chief financial officer and the daughter of the company’s founder, is still being held in Canada where she is fighting extradition to the US.
She is wanted there on charges of fraud and sanctions violations – claims she denies.
“This new indictment is part of the Justice Department’s attempt to irrevocably damage Huawei’s reputation and its business for reasons related to competition rather than law enforcement,” the company said.
In the updated indictment, the US accuses Huawei of racketeering and trade secret theft, and gives more detail about the firm’s efforts to evade US rules on doing business with Iran and North Korea.
Prosecutors also said Huawei offered bonuses to staff who obtained “confidential information” from its competitors.
“As a consequence of its campaign to steal this technology and intellectual property, Huawei was able to drastically cut its research and development costs and associated delays, giving the company a significant and unfair competitive advantage,” prosecutors said.
Huawei said the new charges are a “contrived repackaging” of claims that have already been litigated in civil court.
“The government will not prevail on these charges which we will prove to be both unfounded and unfair,” the company said.
The new charges, filed in federal court in Brooklyn on Thursday, suggest the US is not backing away from its fight over Huawei, which has added to tensions between the US and China, and complicated American relationships with allies.
The US has pushed partners such as the UK to ban Huawei technology from their networks, maintaining the company’s equipment could be used for spying by China.
Despite the pressure, the UK last month announced it would continue using Huawei technology in its growing 5G networks, but with restrictions.
Netflix accused of ‘superhighway robbery’ in Parliament

Netflix has been accused of committing “superhighway robbery” by not paying any corporation tax in the UK.
Labour MP Dame Margaret Hodge told MPs the taxpayer was “being taken for a ride” by the video streaming service.
Quoting research from the think tank Tax Watch, she said the firm should have paid over £13m in UK tax in 2019 but “deliberately avoided” doing so.
Netflix says it complies with the rules of countries it operates in, adding that taxation reform is needed.
The company said it supported “the OECD’s (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s) proposal for companies to pay more tax in the countries where their operations help generate value”.
Responding for the government in the debate, Financial Secretary to the Treasury, Jesse Norman, told MPs he could not comment on individual companies.
But, he added, under international tax rules the UK was already entitled to tax the share of a company’s profits that relate to production activities.
And he said that creative industries made an important contribution to the economy.
Dame Margaret, who has waged a long-running campaign against big tech firms over alleged tax avoidance, called for the government to extend its new digital services tax to cover video streaming services when it comes into force on 1 April 2020.
The current plan will see the likes of Facebook, Google and Amazon pay 2% of revenues to the Treasury to correct the “misalignment between the place where profits are taxed and the place where value is created”.
The ex-Labour minister said including Netflix would ensure the firm, whose whose hit shows include The Crown, “starts to pay its fair share”.
According to estimates by Tax Watch, Netflix had 11.62 million subscribers in the UK in 2019.
The think tank said this would have generated £1.1bn in income for the company, with an estimated profit of £69m – meaning it should have paid £13m in tax.
In its latest filing with Companies’ House, the UK arm of Netflix said it only made profits of £2.35m in the country.
Dame Margaret, who chairs the all-party parliamentary group on responsible taxation, also said Netflix received £924,000 from the UK government via the high-end television tax relief, given to companies that produce television shows in the UK.
She told MPs: “Netflix takes out of the public purse more than it contributes in corporation tax. While Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs fails to collect money from it in corporation tax, the US government is extracting tax from the same profits that it earns here and then hides in unknown tax havens.”
She added: “What is particularly galling is that Netflix actually makes a net profit from the UK taxpayer. In the last two years it has received nearly £1m from the government in tax credits, and that is just the start.
“It is nothing less than superhighway robbery. The UK taxpayer is being taken for a ride. We are actually handing over cash while Netflix stashes money offshore.”
‘Create value’
Dame Margaret said that Netflix was “far from the only culprit” and “tax credit abuse is rife in other industries, including film and video games”.
In response, Treasury minister Mr Norman said: “The government does recognise that some multinational businesses have sought to avoid paying their fair share of tax in the UK by entering into contrived arrangements to divert profits to low tax jurisdictions.
“The effect of this is to deprive the Exchequer of revenues needed to fund the public services on which we all rely.
“It’s completely unacceptable, which is why the government has taken robust action designed to inhibit or prevent it.”
He said the government’s digital services tax was designed to target companies that “rely on their users to create value where that value is not recognised under current international tax rules”.
But the new tax was meant to be a “temporary measure pending agreement of a long-term global solution, potentially including the United States, that will address the wider challenges posed by digitisation”.
He also reminded MPs that Netflix was “planning to invest about £232m in Shepperton Studios”, near London, which, he said, was “not a trivial act”.
Mr Norman said businesses should be “incentivised” to invest in the UK’s creative economy, and added: “It is equally right that HMRC should subject large businesses to an appropriate level of scrutiny and my understanding is they are actively investigating around half of the UK’s large businesses at any given time.”
Netflix said in a statement: “We believe that international taxation needs reform and support the OECD’s (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s) proposal for companies to pay more tax in the countries where their operations help generate value.
“In the meantime, we comply with the rules in every country where we operate.
“The Tax Watch report has a number of inaccuracies, including that Netflix has a Caribbean-based entity.
“This is no longer the case as we significantly simplified our tax structure last year.
“Netflix continues to invest heavily in the UK – spending more than £400m on local productions in 2019, which helped to create over 25,000 jobs and training placements.”
Facebook boss ‘happy to pay more tax in Europe’

The boss of Facebook says he accepts tech giants may have to pay more tax in Europe in future and recognises people’s “frustration” over the issue.
Mark Zuckerberg also said he backed plans by think tank the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development to find a global solution.
Facebook and others have been accused of not paying their fair share of tax in countries where they operate.
But some say the OECD is moving too slowly towards its goal of a 2020 deal.
In the UK, Facebook paid just £28.5m in corporation tax in 2018 despite generating a record £1.65bn in British sales.
At the time tax campaigner and MP Margaret Hodge said such a low bill was “outrageous”, but Facebook said it pays what it owes.
In a conference in Munich this Saturday, Mr Zuckerberg will say: “I understand that there’s frustration about how tech companies are taxed in Europe.
“We also want tax reform and I’m glad the OECD is looking at this. We want the OECD process to succeed so that we have a stable and reliable system going forward.
“And we accept that may mean we have to pay more tax and pay it in different places under a new framework.”
The UK has said it plans to introduce its own digital services tax in April, despite US objections, in a move that could generate up to £500m a year.
However, it is unclear how the resignation of Sajid Javid as chancellor – a major supporter of the tax – will affect the move.
France has agreed to postpone its own digital sales tax, but only until the end of the year, pending a global agreement. Washington had threatened to impose tariffs on French champagne and cheese in retaliation.
What is a digital sales tax?
Many governments are concerned that US technology giants are avoiding taxes in the European Union. They argue taxes should be based on where the digital activity – browsing the page – takes place, not where firms have their headquarters.
In response the UK, along with several other European countries, have proposed new tax rules.
Britain, for example, would tax the revenues of search engines, social media platforms and online marketplaces at 2%. France’s goal has been 3%.
But trade officials in Washington say US firms are being unfairly targeted.
In January US Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin threatened new tariffs on UK carmakers, arguing the digital tax would be “discriminatory in nature”
Griveaux Paris race: Sex video prompts Macron ally to step down

A sex video has ended French ruling party candidate Benjamin Griveaux’s hopes of becoming mayor of Paris.
The ex-spokesman for President Emmanuel Macron’s government, who was already trailing in the race, was apparently targeted by a Russian protest artist accusing him of hypocrisy.
“No-one should be subjected to such abuse,” said Mr Griveaux, 41.
The video, showing a man in a compromising position, quickly spread on social media late on Thursday.
Petr Pavlensky, who sought asylum from Russia in 2017, said he had posted the video online.
Opponents from across France’s political spectrum voiced their outrage.
Incumbent Mayor Anne Hidalgo appealed for respect for people’s private lives, while far-left leader Jean-Luc Mélenchon condemned the attack as “odious”. Prime Minister Edouard Philippe expressed his support for his former colleague.
The video appeared on a little known website that featured a profile of Mr Griveaux’s political ambitions and his “fanatical faith in family values”. It then alleged that Mr Griveaux had exchanged intimate mobile phone messages with a young woman and sent her a personal video.
A link to the site was shared by an MP who was forced to resign from Mr Macron’s LREM (Republic on the Move) party in late 2018.
Mr Griveaux told the BFMTV news channel that for the past year he and his family had been subjected to “defamatory remarks, lies, rumours, anonymous attacks… and even death threats”.
“This torrent of mud has affected me and above all hurt the people I love.”
Mr Griveaux’s lawyer said he would press charges over the publication of the video, which he said violated the right to a private life.
Who is Petr Pavlensky?
Mr Pavlensky, who says he posted the video online, first gained notoriety by nailing his scrotum to Moscow’s Red Square in 2013. He fled Russia and sought asylum in France when he was accused by the authorities of a sexual assault that he denied.
He served seven months in jail for setting the front door of the FSB intelligence agency on fire in Moscow. He later caused minor damage to a Banque de France branch by setting that alight.
He told French news channel LCI that Mr Griveaux was only the first politician that he would target: he had only just begun, he claimed. Politicians had to be honest and he said he would carry on fighting the “propaganda and puritanism of politicians”.
Is this bad news for Macron?
Mr Griveaux was not favourite to win the mayoral race in March, but he has been a very close ally of the president and his political demise is inevitably an embarrassment for the president, the BBC’s Hugh Schofield reports from Paris.
He was trailing in third place, his campaign hampered by a dissident Macronite candidate called Cédric Villani.
Ms Hidalgo, the current Socialist mayor, is leading in the polls, ahead of Republicans candidate Rachida Dati.
Mr Macron came to power in 2017 and his new LREM party secured a majority in the National Assembly. However, the party has seen a spate of defections in recent months and now has only 299 MPs in the National Assembly, down from 314 three years ago.
LREM is expected to have poor local election results next month, but its majority in parliament is safe because of its alliance with the MoDem party.